Skip to main content

rpc-api-choices

Node.js with gRPC on AWS EC2​

  • Uses Node.js with gRPC, a high-performance RPC framework, deployed on AWS EC2 instances.
  • Advantages: gRPC offers efficient communication and a robust framework for service-to-service interactions; AWS EC2 provides full control over the hosting environment.
  • Disadvantages: Requires managing infrastructure and handling scaling; gRPC's binary protocol might be complex for newcomers.

TypeScript with tRPC on Vercel​

  • Integrates TypeScript with tRPC, which allows for end-to-end typesafe APIs, hosted on Vercel for serverless deployment.
  • Advantages: Type safety across the stack reduces bugs; Vercel offers simple deployments and serverless scaling.
  • Disadvantages: tRPC is relatively new and might lack extensive community resources; Vercel's serverless model can have cold starts.

Node.js with JSON-RPC on Google Compute Engine​

  • Combines Node.js with JSON-RPC protocol for remote procedure calls, deployed on Google Compute Engine for scalable VMs.
  • Advantages: JSON-RPC is simple and transport-agnostic; Google Compute Engine offers reliable infrastructure with Google's network.
  • Disadvantages: JSON-RPC might not be as performant as binary protocols; managing VMs requires operational expertise.

TypeScript with Tarpc on AWS Lambda​

  • Utilizes TypeScript for application logic with Tarpc, an RPC framework for Rust, in a serverless environment with AWS Lambda.
  • Advantages: Tarpc supports async communication and TypeScript ensures type safety; AWS Lambda offers a pay-per-use model.
  • Disadvantages: Tarpc is Rust-centric, adding complexity to the stack; AWS Lambda has limitations like cold starts and execution time.

Node.js with Seneca on Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)​

  • Employs Node.js with Seneca, a microservices toolkit for Node.js, orchestrated using Azure Kubernetes Service.
  • Advantages: Seneca provides a microservices architectural approach; AKS enables easy scaling and management of containers.
  • Disadvantages: Seneca’s pattern matching approach may have a learning curve; Kubernetes requires significant DevOps expertise.

Node.js with Dapr on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)​

  • Uses Node.js with Dapr, a portable event-driven runtime, deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine for container management.
  • Advantages: Dapr simplifies building microservices; GKE provides powerful orchestration and scaling features.
  • Disadvantages: Dapr’s abstraction can introduce complexity; GKE requires in-depth knowledge of Kubernetes.

TypeScript with NestJS gRPC Microservices on AWS Fargate​

  • Integrates TypeScript with NestJS framework using its gRPC microservices package, deployed on AWS Fargate for serverless containers.
  • Advantages: NestJS provides a structured framework with TypeScript's benefits; AWS Fargate removes the need to manage servers.
  • Disadvantages: AWS Fargate can be more expensive at scale; gRPC setup in NestJS has a learning curve.

Node.js with Hemera on Azure Container Instances​

  • Combines Node.js with Hemera, a lightweight message-bus microservice framework for NATS, on Azure Container Instances.
  • Advantages: Hemera offers pattern-based microservice architecture; Azure Container Instances enable rapid container deployment.
  • Disadvantages: NATS ecosystem may be unfamiliar to some; managing containers still requires operational oversight.

TypeScript with Micro on DigitalOcean Kubernetes​

  • Leverages TypeScript with Micro, a modern async RPC framework for microservices, on DigitalOcean's managed Kubernetes platform.
  • Advantages: Micro provides a simple RPC model with async/await; DigitalOcean Kubernetes simplifies Kubernetes deployment.
  • Disadvantages: Requires familiarity with the nuances of RPC; Kubernetes management can be complex for larger deployments.

Node.js with ActionHero on AWS Elastic Beanstalk​

  • Uses Node.js with ActionHero, a multi-transport Node.js API server framework, deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk for easy scaling and deployment.
  • Advantages: ActionHero supports both web sockets and HTTP; Elastic Beanstalk automates deployment, from capacity provisioning to load balancing.
  • Disadvantages: Elastic Beanstalk can abstract too much control from developers; ActionHero has a smaller community than other frameworks.